Test suites that AI maintains as your code evolves.
Test generation, regression triage, flaky-test detection. Agents do the maintenance, humans set the policy. Coverage that doesn't decay.
Why this engagement exists.
On the suites we maintain, teams cut test-maintenance time 60-80% in the first quarter, not by writing more tests by hand, but by wiring AI into the workflow so coverage stays current and flaky tests get triaged automatically. The pattern is framework-agnostic: Jest, Vitest, Playwright, Pytest, Go test. Your engineers stop paying the maintenance tax; the coverage stops decaying.
Deliverables, not promises.
Every engagement ships these artefacts. Nothing here is fluff. Each item is something your team will hold in their hands at the end.
Test framework audit
Coverage map of your current suite, with flaky-test inventory and runtime budget.
AI-generated scaffolds
Unit + integration test scaffolds from your code, reviewed by humans before merge.
Smart test selection
Changed-code-aware selection runs the tests that matter, not the whole suite, every PR.
Flaky-test detection
Auto-quarantine flaky tests with a triage queue and weekly fix-or-delete reviews.
Coverage dashboards
Per-team coverage trends, surfaced where engineers will see them (not buried in a wiki).
Team training
Workshop on the AI testing workflow + a playbook your team owns after we leave.
The process, step by step.
No mystery, no consultant theatre. This is how the work actually flows from kickoff to handover.
- Step 1
Audit the current suite
Coverage map, flake inventory, runtime budget. We know where we are before we change anything.
- Step 2
Set up generation pipeline
AI test scaffold generation wired into the PR workflow, behind a "review before merge" gate.
- Step 3
Smart selection
Test selection runs the tests that the PR can actually affect. Saves hours per PR on large suites.
- Step 4
Flake triage
Detection + auto-quarantine + weekly fix-or-delete review. Flakes stop blocking the team.
- Step 5
Dashboard + training
Coverage dashboards + a team workshop. Your engineers own the workflow afterwards.
One example: the Jest + Playwright suite on a 400k-line clinical platform, where changed-code-aware selection and auto-quarantine bounded the maintenance the team had been paying every sprint. Results vary with your starting coverage and framework, but the harder gain is that engineers stop avoiding tests once the rot is bounded.
The questions that actually come up.
No. AI writes the volume tests (CRUD, structural, edge cases). Your engineers design the high-judgement tests where logic matters. Both are reviewed before merge.
Related services
All servicesCustom Agents
Agents that actually do work: internal tooling, customer-facing automation, clinical workflows. Built with guardrails, evaluated, monitored.
Self-Hosted CI/CD
Build, test, and deploy without your code, secrets, or PHI leaving your network. GitHub Actions self-hosted runners, Argo, Tekton: your choice.
Feature Development
Senior engineers with AI tooling. The feature lands, the existing system keeps shipping.
Ready to scope AI-Driven QA + Testing?
A 30-minute call. We map your situation against the engagement, give you a real estimate, and tell you honestly whether we are the right team for this.